top of page

Fighting Trade-Based Money Laundering in a Transforming Global Landscape

Writer's picture: Ezequiel DjeredjianEzequiel Djeredjian

Updated: 5 days ago


Global trade and finance are transforming amid geopolitics, tech advances, and financial crime, challenging institutions and practitioners.


Following our webinar on "Evolving TBML Tactics" last January, this article examines how these forces are reshaping trade compliance requirements and creating new imperatives for financial institutions.


Global Context: A Period of Fundamental Change


The last 10 years have given way to a more volatile and fragmented international trade environment than that we have seen compared with the prior march of globalization from the 1990s. The impact and current situation leads us to believe that this shift isn't merely cyclical - but rather represents a structural transformation in how global trade operates and how risks manifest within trading relationships.


The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) launched by China in 2013 has fundamentally altered trade infrastructure and relationships, particularly across Asia, Africa, and Europe. This massive infrastructure project has created new trade corridors and shifted traditional shipping routes. And the related extension of “soft power” through investment by China has led to some concerned reactions in leading Western economies.


The COVID-19, the pandemic served as an unexpected catalyst, exposing critical vulnerabilities in global supply chains that many had long suspected but few had actively addressed. The pandemic's impact extended beyond immediate health concerns, forcing a fundamental reassessment of supply chain resilience and trade partner relationships. Companies that once prioritized efficiency through just-in-time inventory systems are now building redundancy and geographic diversification into their trade networks.


The Russian invasion of Ukraine has dramatically transformed the sanctions landscape, with Western efforts to cut the majority of the country out of vital import and export flows. This has led to the emergence of parallel trading systems, an aging and dangerous “dark fleet” of Russian vessels shipping crude oil globally, and the explicit support of a pariah economy by ambivalent democracies such as India, South Africa and Turkey through currencies and mechanisms alternate to the US dollar and Euro. This isn't merely a temporary adjustment - it represents a structural shift in how global trade operates. 


Countries and companies are now actively reassessing their trade relationships through the lens of geopolitical risk, leading to what some analysts term "friend-shoring" - the concentration of trade relationships within politically aligned nations.


Trade tensions between major powers, particularly the US and China, have added another layer of complexity. The implementation of tariffs and technology export controls has created a ripple effect throughout global supply chains. The Belt and Road Initiative is simultaneously creating new trade corridors while raising questions about economic dependency and strategic vulnerability.


The Red Sea crisis, sparked by attacks on commercial vessels, represents the latest in a series of major disruptions to global shipping routes. This follows the March 2021 grounding of the Ever Given container ship in the Suez Canal, which completely blocked this crucial waterway for six days, forcing many vessels to reroute around Africa's Cape of Good Hope which significantly impacted Asia/Europe trade routes for months.


The recent situation in the Red Sea has again compelled shipping companies to avoid the Suez Canal route, leading to similar diversions. Compounding these challenges, the Panama Canal has been operating at reduced capacity due to severe drought conditions affecting the freshwater system needed for its locks. This has resulted in significant delays, with some vessels opting for the longer Straits of Magellan route around South America.


This rerouting and disruptions has significant implications for trade finance and compliance where financial institutions must now address new challenges including extended transaction timelines, increased shipping costs, and heightened insurance premiums. In addition, the upscale in sanctions and tariffs has also highlighted the need for more sophisticated vessel tracking and monitoring systems, as well as enhanced due diligence processes for maritime trade finance.



TBML schemes and challenges on the rise


This massive reconfiguration has shaken the trade industry and created a fertile soil for a new set of trade based money laundering schemes and a variety of new channels to arise. Amongst these some of the most impacted and on the rise include:


– Counterparty Complexity

Modern trade relationships rarely follow simple buyer-seller dynamics. Instead, they often involve complex networks of intermediaries, holding companies, and beneficial owners. Financial institutions must now maintain sophisticated systems for mapping these relationships and identifying potential risks several steps removed from the immediate transaction participants.


– Invoice Manipulation Evolution

The traditional detection of invoice manipulation has evolved into a multi-dimensional challenge in today's trade landscape. Modern schemes involve sophisticated layering across multiple jurisdictions, where transactions are documented differently in various markets.


The complexity of global supply chains, combined with rapid price fluctuations in disrupted markets, has made it increasingly difficult to establish "true" market prices. Financial institutions must now detect manipulation in transactions involving multiple invoices, complex pricing structures, and intricate payment arrangements across different jurisdictions.


– Digital Trade Exploitation

The digitalization of trade has created new vulnerabilities at the intersection of physical and digital commerce. The rise of e-commerce has introduced challenges in reconciling digital records with physical goods movement, creating opportunities for documentation fraud that are harder to detect than traditional paper-based schemes.


Financial institutions must develop capabilities to track and verify digital trade flows while managing the risk of digital documentation being manipulated or falsified in ways that are more sophisticated than traditional paper alterations.


– Alternative Payment Channel Risk

The emergence of new payment mechanisms has fundamentally altered the trade finance landscape. Transactions now flow through a complex web of alternative payment systems, digital platforms, and novel settlement mechanisms, creating new challenges in maintaining payment transparency and tracing fund flows.


Financial institutions must contend with a proliferation of payment methods that may bypass traditional banking controls, including digital currencies and new financial technology platforms. These alternative channels often operate under different regulatory frameworks across jurisdictions, creating potential gaps in oversight.



Sanctions evasion ever more difficult to detect


Within financial institutions, trade finance operations bear the unique burden of detecting sanctions violations by scrutinizing complex layers of information - from shipping routes and vessel behavior to cargo descriptions and documentation discrepancies.


The recent supply chain disruptions and evolving trade patterns have created new opportunities for increasingly sophisticated sanctions evasion schemes that are becoming harder to detect through traditional monitoring approaches.


– Dual-Use Dilemma

Perhaps no area better illustrates the increasing complexity of trade compliance than the challenge of dual-use goods. Financial institutions now find themselves needing to understand not just what is being traded, but the full spectrum of how items might be used. This requires a level of technical expertise previously unnecessary in trade finance. A seemingly innocent industrial machine might have applications in restricted military production, requiring banks to develop sophisticated frameworks for evaluating end-use risk.


– Export Controls Complexity

Many countries maintain regulations restricting goods and services to specific countries, entities, or individuals based on national security, foreign policy, and economic interests. Financial institutions must understand not only what is being traded but also the ultimate destination and end-user, navigating complex country-specific rules and lists to determine if transactions are allowed, require export licenses, or are prohibited. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has significantly increased both the volume and frequency of changes to export controls. Banks must evaluate every transaction against an ever-changing set of controlled items, restricted destinations, and prohibited end-users to ensure regulatory compliance.


– Transshipment Challenge

Transshipment has emerged as a critical compliance challenge. While legitimate transshipment serves essential logistical purposes, it can also obscure the true origin and destination of goods. Financial institutions must trace complex shipping routes and identify suspicious patterns, particularly when countries suddenly display manufacturing capabilities that defy economic logic - such as dramatic increases in steel production following tariffs on traditional producers.


Additionally, institutions must monitor attempts to evade export controls through intermediate countries. This has become especially relevant as Russia obtains restricted technology and military components through neighboring allies and trading hubs with lighter restrictions.



Strategic Imperatives for Financial Institutions


The rapid reconfiguration of global trade patterns over the past decade has fundamentally altered the landscape of trade-based financial flows. These shifts have created new vulnerabilities and opportunities for exploitation, from the challenges of dual-use goods and complex transshipment patterns to the emergence of sophisticated digital schemes and alternative payment channels.


Amid these evolving challenges, regulatory expectations continue to intensify. Banks' trade finance operations face mounting pressure to enhance their compliance frameworks, implement more sophisticated monitoring systems, and maintain increasingly detailed documentation - all while managing existing resource constraints and operational complexities.


Financial institutions have had to radically transform their approach to trade monitoring and compliance, developing new capabilities and frameworks to address these evolving challenges. As we'll explore in the next part of this series, the response to these challenges requires not just technological solutions, but a fundamental rethinking of how we approach trade finance risk management in an increasingly complex global economy.


 

Discover how TradeSpeed can help your institution detect and prevent trade-based financial crime → https://www.complidata.io/tradespeed


153 views

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow us to get the latest news, and our in-house expert takes on industry affairs!
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

info@complidata.io©2024 by Complidata

bottom of page