Financial crime has become increasingly sophisticated, prompting banks to reassess and enhance both their AML compliance and sanctions screening systems. In Part 1 of the series, we explored the global landscape and emerging risks; in this second part, we focus on the driving force behind this transformation—the evolving regulatory environment.
The Evolving Regulatory Landscape: Regional and Global
Regulatory scrutiny is intensifying globally, but with distinct regional variations. In the United States, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) are expanding their enforcement efforts, imposing record fines on banks for sanctions breaches and AML lapses.
A key focus area is trade finance, where regulators expect banks to conduct stringent sanctions screening on all parties involved in a transaction, including suppliers, intermediaries, and logistics providers. Failing to monitor hidden ownership structures or sanctioned parties can lead to severe penalties.
Europe is also undergoing a regulatory overhaul with the formation of the EU Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), which will centralize AML supervision and impose stricter reporting requirements. This follows years of fragmented enforcement across member states, which has allowed financial crime risks to persist. Banks operating in the EU must now prepare for deeper cross-border transaction scrutiny and higher expectations for automated monitoring and reporting.
In Asia, regulatory authorities are ramping up AML compliance expectations, particularly in trade finance hubs like Singapore and Hong Kong. With illicit trade increasingly moving through these jurisdictions, financial institutions must improve their transaction monitoring and sanctions screening processes. Singapore’s MAS has introduced enhanced trade-based money laundering (TBML) guidelines, requiring banks to implement real-time vessel tracking and dual-use goods screening.
The Middle East, once seen as a compliance laggard, is undergoing rapid regulatory transformation. The UAE, in response to its grey listing by FATF, has amended its AML laws to tighten enforcement and expand Know Your Customer’s Customer (KYCC) and Know Your Customer’s Supplier (KYCS) requirements. Financial institutions must now ensure full transparency across trade flows, applying AI-driven solutions to map relationships between buyers, sellers, and intermediaries. This reflects a broader regional effort to combat trade-based financial crime.
Sanctions screening has never been more complex. In the past few years the expectations have been taken to a different level. Not only has there been an increased velocity of changes to the sanction lists and export controls primarily to Russia and China in response to geo-political challenges, the level of expected oversight has expanded significantly, requiring financial institutions to scrutinize transactions with unprecedented depth. Banks must screen not just customers but entire trade flows. Every party involved in a transaction—person, business, country, port, address, vessel—must be checked for sanctions exposure.
A bank financing an export deal must verify that the shipping vessel itself is not sanctioned, the ports that it stops at are not sanctioned, or have not had any suspicious activity such as turning off its transponder or participating in ship-to-ship transfers. Needless to say, this level of detail requires continuous monitoring. Automated sanctions screening systems help by instantly cross-referencing trade data with evolving sanctions lists, reducing risk and ensuring compliance with sanctions regulations in real time.
Alongside heightened expectations of greater oversight and control, the banks are also expected to stay up-to-date with changes in rules. AML red flags, vessel monitoring rules, and export control measures are frequently updated, and failure to comply can result in costly investigations. Automation allows banks to integrate real-time regulatory updates directly into their systems, ensuring that all transactions meet the latest compliance standards. Automated audit trails also provide seamless proof of due diligence, reducing regulatory risk.
Of course, the most significant challenges of global AML compliance is navigating the differing requirements across jurisdictions. With many banks operating in multiple regions, it’s critical to align local policies with global standards. Cooperation between international regulators is key to ensuring that financial crimes don't simply shift to jurisdictions with looser regulations.
The Internal Incentives to Change
Beyond regulatory pressures, banks have strong internal incentives to automate AML compliance. Automation helps streamline processes, allowing the same workforce to handle more transactions while eliminating operational bottlenecks. This shift enables compliance teams to focus on higher-value tasks, such as investigating complex cases and building client relationships.
Additionally, the aging workforce in the financial industry, combined with the younger generation’s preference for technology-driven, less manual-intensive roles, accelerates the need for automation. Younger employees are seeking more meaningful, interactive work, moving away from traditional, repetitive compliance tasks.
This scenario creates a prime opportunity for automation and GenAI-powered solutions in trade finance. By investing in these technologies, financial institutions not only manage to meet regulatory demands but also position themselves as attractive employers in a competitive job market.
Automation is not just about efficiency—it is about survival. Banks that fail to modernise will face mounting compliance costs, increased regulatory scrutiny, and potential penalties. Those that invest in automation will not only improve compliance but also position themselves as industry leaders in financial crime prevention. By embracing automation, banks can turn AML compliance from a costly obligation into a strategic advantage.
As banks look to modernise their AML compliance and sanctions screening processes, automation and digitisation, which is often mixed up, must go hand in hand. The shift toward automated compliance solutions aligns seamlessly with the ongoing transformation in trade finance, where the industry is increasingly moving toward fully digital and paperless transactions. In Part 3 of this series, we will look closer at this movement, and why automation must be accompanied by digitisation to drive meaningful change.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Discover how TradeSpeed can help your institution detect and prevent trade-based financial crime → https://www.complidata.io/tradespeed
